System Spec's:
pcstats
test system #1 specs: |
|
computer hardware:
|
|
processor: |
athlonxp 3200+ |
clock speed:
|
11 x 200 mhz = 2.2 ghz
10 x 223 mhz = 2.23 ghz |
motherboards: |
epox 8rga+ |
chipsets: |
nforce2 igp |
videocard: |
ati radeon 9700 pro (325/620) |
memory: |
2x 512b corsair twinx1024-4000* |
hard drive:
|
40gb wd special ed. |
cdrom: |
nec 52x cd-rom |
floppy: |
panasonic 1.44mb floppy drive |
heatsink: |
thermalright sk6 w/36cfm delta |
powersupply: |
vantec 470w stealth psu |
software
setup |
windowsxp build 2600 nforce2 2.03 catalyst 3.5 |
benchmarks |
sisoft sandra 2003 pcmark2002 3dmark2001se quake iii
arena ut2003 |
* - memory was running with 2-3-3-6 timings for all
benchmarks!
pcstats
test system #2 specs: |
|
computer hardware:
|
|
processor: |
pentium 4 2.4c |
clock speed:
|
12 x 200 mhz = 2.4 ghz
12 x 258 mhz = 3.1 ghz |
motherboards: |
abit is7-g |
chipsets: |
i865pe |
videocard: |
ati radeon 9800 pro (380/680)** |
memory: |
2x 512b corsair twinx1024-4000*** |
hard drive:
|
40gb wd special ed. |
cdrom: |
nec 52x cd-rom |
floppy: |
panasonic 1.44mb floppy drive |
heatsink: |
thermalright sk6 w/36cfm delta |
powersupply: |
pc p&c 510 turbo cool |
software
setup |
windowsxp build 2600 intel 5.00.1012 catalyst
3.5 |
** - sorry guys, the intel test system
was only available with the ati radeon 9800 pro for this review.
*** - memory was
running 3-4-4-8 for all intel benchmarks!
Sisoft Sandra 2003 Pro |
Source: Sandra |
|
Sandra is designed to test the theoretical
power of a complete system and individual components. The numbers
taken though are again, purely theoretical and may not represent real world
performance. Higher numbers represent better performance.
SiSoft Sandra 2003 Benchmark
Results |
|
Memory Benchmark
(FSB/Memory) |
|
|
AMD/ALU |
|
1. |
Integer ALU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (200/400
MHz) |
3015 MB/s |
2. |
Integer ALU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (223/446
MHz) |
3456 MB/s |
|
Intel/ALU |
|
4. |
Integer ALU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (200/400
MHz) |
4858 MB/s |
5. |
Integer ALU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (258/516
MHz) |
5676 MB/s |
|
AMD/FPU |
|
1. |
Float FPU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (200/400
MHz) |
2741 MB/s |
2. |
Float FPU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (223/446
MHz) |
3198 MB/s |
|
Intel/ALU |
|
4. |
Integer ALU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (200/400
MHz) |
5606 MB/s |
5. |
Integer ALU - 2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (258/516
MHz) |
5650 MB/s |
In SiSoft Sandra we see that bandwidth increases
nicely when both Intel and AMD systems are overclocked.
PCMark can be used on desktop PC's, Laptops and
even Workstations and tests everyday computing from home to office usage. PCMark
specifically stresses the CPU, memory subsystem, graphics subsystem, hard
drives, WindowsXP GUI (if WinXP is used), video performance and even laptop
batteries.
PCMark2002
Benchmark Results |
|
AMD Memory
(FSB/Memory) |
Score |
Ranking |
1 |
2x 512MB Corsair TwinX
4000 (200/400 MHz) |
6338 |
|
2. |
2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (223/446 MHz) |
7015 |
|
|
Intel Memory (FSB/Memory) |
|
|
1. |
2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (200/400 MHz) |
9751 |
|
2. |
2x 512MB Corsair TwinX 4000 (258/516 MHz) |
10375 |
|
It seems
like the AMD system benefits more from the increased bandwidth than the Pentium
4. Let's see how this translate into real world numbers.