PCSTATS Test Methodology
On the socket AM2 AMD processor test bed we're only interested in seeing
how high we can go with the memory running 1:1, as running with other dividers
puts the overclocking bottleneck elsewhere and not with the system memory. The
DDR2 RAM latency must run at its lowest possible setting, as quick access is
more important to the CPU design. Just for arguments sake, we will also be
conducting overclocking tests to see how high the memory will go with lax
timings (5-5-5-15), although we will only benchmark the system with the tight
memory timings mentioned above. Let's get started!
Overclocking the Corsair Twin2X2048-8500C5 DDR-2
|
Overclocking Results: |
|
Before overclocking commenced, the CPU clock multiplier
was first lowered to 10x so the AMD Athlon64 FX-62 processor will not hold the
memory back. Starting at 200 MHz, the Foxconn C51XEM2AA motherboard clock speed was increased in 2-4 MHz intervals.
Even with 1.8V voltage being supplied, the Corsair
Twin2X2048-8500C5 memory had absolutely no problems hitting 250 MHz right from the start. Pushing past 250MHz required a bit more voltage, so we increased power to 2.2V which is the default voltage the Corsair Twin2X2048-8500C5 is supposed to run at.
With 2.2V and
the default CAS latency timings of 5-5-5-15, the Corsair Twin2X2048-8500C5 memory was able to clock all the way up to 276 MHz without incident. Anything higher and the motherboard refused to boot into WindowsXP. It's not the fault of the memory, the Foxconn nForce 590 SLI motherboard simply doesn't go any higher.
We're doing things a bit backwards here but since
the Corsair Twin2X2048-8500C5 is sold as high speed, high latency memory we
decided to mainly focus on how the memory performed at its intended settings. Thus the memory timings were set at 4-4-4-12...
We were fairly quick with the low latency testing and the maximum speed the Corsair Twin2X2048-8500C5 memory hit was 238 MHz. Above that mark proved to be unstable ground.
Prelude to Benchmarks
The details of how the Corsair XMS-2 PC2-8500 memory test system
was configured for benchmarking, including the specific hardware, software
drivers, operating system and benchmark versions are indicated below. In the
second column are the general specs for the reference platforms this pair of
DDR-2 memory is to be compared against. Please take a moment to look over
PCSTATS test system configurations before moving on to the individual benchmark
results.
|
PCSTATS Test System Configurations |
|
Office Productivity |
Source: Zdnet |
|
Business Winstone 2004 runs real applications
through a series of scripted activities and uses the time a PC takes to complete
these activities to produce its performance scores.
Content Creation Winstone 2004 is a system-level,
application-based benchmark that measures a PC's overall performance when
running top, Windows-based, 32-bit, content creation applications in Windows
XP.
Office Productivity |
Business Winstone 2004: |
Points |
Ranking |
2x 1024MB Super Talent T800UX2GC4 (200/800) |
36.2 |
|
2x 1024MB Patriot PDC22G800+XBLK (200/800) |
36.3 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-6400C4 (200/800) |
36.3 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-6400C3 (200/800) |
36.8 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 (200/800) |
35.7 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 (276/1104) |
37.3 |
|
Content Creation 2004: |
Points |
Ranking |
2x 1024MB Super Talent T800UX2GC4 (200/800) |
46.3 |
|
2x 1024MB Patriot PDC22G800+XBLK (200/800) |
46.7 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-6400C4 (200/800) |
46.2 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-6400C3 (200/800) |
47.3 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 (200/800) |
48.6 |
|
2x 1024MB Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 (276/1104) |
49.5 |
|
At stock speeds the 2GB Corsair Twin2X2048-8500C5
memory kit does not do quite as well as the other memory in Business Winstone
because of its higher latency... the difference is largely marginal however.
The PC2-8500 memory scores nicely at stock in Content
Creation 2005.