DX10 Videocard Benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, Crysis
Futuremark 3DMark
Vantage 1.0.1 |
Source: FutureMark |
|
3DMark06 is the worldwide standard in advanced 3D game
performance benchmarking. A fundamental tool for every company in the PC
industry as well as PC users and gamers, 3DMark06 uses advanced real-time 3D
game workloads to measure PC performance using a suite of DirectX 9 3D graphics
tests, CPU tests, and 3D feature tests. 3DMark06 tests include all new HDR/SM3.0
graphics tests, SM2.0 graphics tests, AI and physics driven single and multiple
cores or processor CPU tests and a collection of comprehensive feature tests to
reliably measure next generation gaming performance today.
Futuremark 3DMark
Vantage 1.0.1 |
Performance Overall: (P) |
Points |
Ranking |
Palit HD4870 X2
2GB |
9116 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A (Crossfire) |
8852 |
|
Asus
EAH4850 HTDI/512M |
5579 |
|
GPU Score: |
Points |
Ranking |
Palit HD4870 X2
2GB |
12983 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A (Crossfire) |
12252 |
|
Asus
EAH4850 HTDI/512M |
5905 |
|
CPU score: |
Points |
Ranking |
Palit HD4870 X2
2GB |
4814 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A (Crossfire) |
4830 |
|
Asus
EAH4850 HTDI/512M |
4786 |
| |
So how does $200 of video card stack up against a pair of
last year's $250 or $500 flagship cards? 3DMark Vantage shows great scaling with
the multi-GPU cards, but this test tends to be much more optimized for Crossfire
and SLI gaming than what you'd find in real-world situations.
Crysis is a science fiction first-person shooter
developed by Crytek. Crysis uses Microsoft's new API, DirectX 10 for graphics
rendering, and includes the new engine—the CryEngine 2—that is the successor to
Far Cry's CryEngine. CryEngine 2 is among the first engines to use the DirectX
10 framework of Windows Vista, but can also run using DirectX 9, both on Vista
and Windows XP.
Crysis 1.2 (no AA) -
DirectX10 |
1280x1024 HQ |
Points |
Ranking |
Palit HD4870 X2
2GB |
40.46 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A |
39.7 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A (Crossfire) |
39.105 |
|
MSI
R3870X2-T2D1G-OC |
39.4 |
|
Asus
EAH4850 HTDI/512M |
40.835 |
|
1600x1200 HQ |
Points |
Ranking |
Palit HD4870 X2
2GB |
38.2 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A |
34.2 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A (Crossfire) |
37.17 |
|
MSI
R3870X2-T2D1G-OC |
33.8 |
|
Asus
EAH4850 HTDI/512M |
30.79 |
|
1920x1200 HQ |
Points |
Ranking |
Palit HD4870 X2
2GB |
35 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A |
29.9 |
|
Asus EAH3870 X2
1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A (Crossfire) |
34.07 |
|
MSI
R3870X2-T2D1G-OC |
29.7 |
|
Asus
EAH4850 HTDI/512M |
26.2 |
| |
Crysis
shows a much closer race between the cards than 3Dmark - at 1600 X 1200
resolution the Asus EAH4850 is only 20% slower than the 4870X2, a card that
costs 300% more.