|
Intel's Core 2 Duo E8400 is a 3.0GHz dual-core processor based on the 'Wolfdale' core that is being manufactured on the 45nm process. This socket 775 processor packs in 6MB of L2 cache and operates with a 1333MHz Front Side Bus speed.
83% Rating:
|
|
Home >
Reviews >
CPU / Processors >
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
|
|
32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: Cinebench R10, Bibble 5
CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your
computer's performace capabilities. CINEBENCH runs several tests on your
computer to measure the performance of the main processor under real world
circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores
to render a photo-reaslistic image. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive
features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural
shaders. In the first run, the benchmark only uses one CPU (or CPU core), to
ascertain a reference value. On computers that have multiple CPUs or CPU cores
and on those who simulate multiple CPUs (via HyperThreading or similar
technolgies), MAXON CINEBENCH will run a second test using all available CPU
power. Higher results are best. Cinebench is
multi-threaded.
Cinebench R10 |
1 CPU (split between cores) |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Core i7 920 |
3066 |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo
E8400 |
3306 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition |
2920 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(DDR2) |
2565 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition (DDR3)
|
2570 |
|
x CPU (full load all cores) |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Core i7 920 |
12640 |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo
E8400 |
6339 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition |
10455 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(DDR2) |
7064 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition (DDR3)
|
7104 |
| |
While the Intel Core 2 Duo's single-core performance is
tops in Cinebench, this render test scales excellently on multiple cores and can
take advantage of hyperthreading, both of which the Core 2 Duo E8400 processor
is deficient in compared to its multi-core bretheren, so it comes in dead last.
Bibble 5 is a multi-threaded photographic workflow
application that can be used to demonstrate the ability to scale work load
across 4, 8, 16 or more processor cores. The basic process we will use for
benchmarking is to convert a batch of 50 RAW image files from a digital SLR
camera from their original RAW format to JPEG's at full resolution, using the
applications default image settings. Lower results are best.
Bibble 5.0 |
Batch RAW-to-JPEG Conversion:
(sec/Image) |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Core i7 920 |
0.261 |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo
E8400 |
0.61 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition |
0.377 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(DDR2) |
0.6969 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition (DDR3)
|
0.623 |
|
Time to Complete 50 Photo's: (sec) |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Core i7 920 |
13 |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo
E8400 |
30.5 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition |
17.9 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(DDR2) |
20.6969 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition (DDR3)
|
31.2 |
| |
Bibble 5 is designed to scale to multiple cores, which
means that the Core 2 Duo E8400 CPU is rendering the RAW photos to JPEG at a
speed comparable to the Phenom II X3 720 processor.
POV-Ray 3.7
Beta 30 |
Source: POV-RAY |
|
Ray-tracing is a rendering technique that calculates an
image of a scene by simulating the way rays of light travel in the real world.
In the real world, rays of light are emitted from a light source and illuminate
objects. The light reflects off of the objects or passes through transparent
objects. This reflected light hits our eyes or perhaps a camera lens. Because
the vast majority of rays never hit an observer, it would take forever to trace
a scene. Ray-tracing programs like POV-Ray start with their simulated camera and
trace rays backwards out into the scene. The user specifies the location of the
camera, light sources, and objects as well as the surface texture properties of
objects, their interiors (if transparent) and any atmospheric media such as fog,
haze, or fire.
Lower render times are better, however higher Pixel Per
Second rendering values are best. Pov-ray is multi-threaded.
Pov-Ray 3.7 BETA
30 |
Render Time (sec) |
Seconds |
Ranking |
Intel Core i7 920 |
113.8 |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo
E8400 |
382.88 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition |
98.69 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(DDR2) |
445.26 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition (DDR3)
|
444.24 |
|
Render Average (Pixels Per Sec) |
Pixle/Sec |
Ranking |
Intel Core i7 920 |
2303.61 |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo
E8400 |
1357.27 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition |
2656.37 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(DDR2) |
1751.71 |
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition (DDR3)
|
1753.53 |
| |
The Core 2 Duo E8400 processor manages to render
slightly faster the Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition, despite pushing the least
amount of pixels per second.
Contents of Article: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
|
|
Pg 1.
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz 1333MHz FSB Processor Review
Pg 2.
CPU Power Consumption Tests
Pg 3.
Overclocking the Core 2 Duo E8400 / Test System Specs
Pg 4.
32-bit CPU System Benchmarks: SYSMark 2007, PCMark Vantage
Pg 5.
32-Bit CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: Office Productivity, SiSoft Sandra
Pg 6.
32-Bit CPU Calculation Benchmarks: Super Pi, wPrime2.0, ScienceMark2, WinRAR
Pg 7.
— 32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: Cinebench R10, Bibble 5
Pg 8.
32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray, 3.7, SPECviewPerf 10
Pg 9.
32-Bit CPU Synthetic Gaming Benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark 06
Pg 10.
32-Bit CPU Gaming Benchmarks: Crysis, FEAR
Pg 11.
Core 2 Duo E8400 Workhorse CPU
|
|
|