Call of Juarez	Source: Techland

While Call of Juarez pulls off all the classic FPS mechanisms with aplomb, it also features interesting variations that give it the air and feel of a true Western movie. The player has the genuine impression of being a pistol-packing hero in an age when armed confrontation was the daily grind for many adventurers. The Developers have incorporated a classic shooting system as well as two extra game modes.

Call of Juarez - DirectX10 1024x768 Low Settings: Points Ranking Palit HD4870 X2 2GB 79.6 Asus EAH3870 X2 1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A 90.9 MSI R3870X2-T2D1G-OC 90.3 Asus EAH4890 HTDI/1GD5/A 127.6 Asus EAH4850 HTDI/512M 70.8 MSI R4830 T2D512-OC (Radeon 4830) 84.3 Gigabyte GV-R477D5-512HB 78.4 Asus EAH4770 HTDI/512MD5/A 106.9 ASUS EAH4550 512M 28.2 Diamond HD 3650 PE 512 25.7 Diamond Viper Radeon HD 2900XT 56.8 MSI RX2600XT Diamond 44.3 ASUS ENGTX260 MT/HTDI/896MD3-A 108.5 Gigabyte GV-N26OC896H-GA 115.3 Sparkle GTX260 Core 216 108.2 ASUS ENGTS250 DK 88.1 ASUS EN9600GT DI/512MD3/A 61.1 Gigabyte GV-N96TSL-1GI 65.3 Asus EN9600GT Top/HTDI/512M 65.4 Foxconn 9600GT-512NOC 64.4 Palit Geforce 9600GT 512 65.4 Biostar V903GT52-NV1AN 60.3 ASUS EN9400GT DI/1GLP 21.7 Asus EN8800GT TOP/G/HTDP/512M/A 58.3 Foxconn 8600GTS-256 46.3 MSI NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC 48.1 Albatron 8600GT-256 40.3 MSI NX8500GT-TD256E 23.4 1024x768 High Settings: Points Ranking Palit HD4870 X2 2GB 87.6 Asus EAH3870 X2 1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A 38.1 MSI R3870X2-T2D1G-OC 37.9 Asus EAH4890 HTDI/1GD5/A 75.2 Asus EAH4850 HTDI/512M 37.4 MSI R4830 T2D512-OC (Radeon 4830) 45.2 Gigabyte GV-R477D5-512HB 38.9 Asus EAH4770 HTDI/512MD5/A 54.2 ASUS EAH4550 512M 12.7 Diamond HD 3650 PE 512 10.4 Diamond Viper Radeon HD 2900XT 34.1 MSI RX2600XT Diamond 10.5 ASUS ENGTX260 MT/HTDI/896MD3-A 54.7 Gigabyte GV-N26OC896H-GA 58.6 Sparkle GTX260 Core 216 56 ASUS ENGTS250 DK 43.6 ASUS EN9600GT DI/512MD3/A 28.1 Gigabyte GV-N96TSL-1GI 30.1 Asus EN9600GT Top/HTDI/512M 27.8 Foxconn 9600GT-512NOC 27.3 Palit Geforce 9600GT 512 27.7 Biostar V903GT52-NV1AN 25.6 ASUS EN9400GT DI/1GLP 8.3 Asus EN8800GT TOP/G/HTDP/512M/A 26.1 Foxconn 8600GTS-256 12.8 MSI NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC 13.1 Albatron 8600GT-256 10.8 MSI NX8500GT-TD256E 6.6 1600x1200 Low Settings: Points Ranking Palit HD4870 X2 2GB 121.1 Asus EAH3870 X2 1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A 38 MSI R3870X2-T2D1G-OC 71.9 Asus EAH4890 HTDI/1GD5/A 85.5 Asus EAH4850 HTDI/512M 59.2 MSI R4830 T2D512-OC (Radeon 4830) 51.9 Gigabyte GV-R477D5-512HB 28.4 Asus EAH4770 HTDI/512MD5/A 61.9 ASUS EAH4550 512M 14.9 Diamond HD 3650 PE 512 13.4 Diamond Viper Radeon HD 2900XT 43.1 MSI RX2600XT Diamond 11.4 ASUS ENGTX260 MT/HTDI/896MD3-A 26 Gigabyte GV-N26OC896H-GA 71.7 Sparkle GTX260 Core 216 27.6 ASUS ENGTS250 DK 53.1 ASUS EN9600GT DI/512MD3/A 18.8 Gigabyte GV-N96TSL-1GI 39.4 Asus EN9600GT Top/HTDI/512M 40.3 Foxconn 9600GT-512NOC 39.3 Palit Geforce 9600GT 512 40.4 Biostar V903GT52-NV1AN 36.4 ASUS EN9400GT DI/1GLP 11.2 Asus EN8800GT TOP/G/HTDP/512M/A 36.2 Foxconn 8600GTS-256 14.4 MSI NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC 14.5 Albatron 8600GT-256 10.9 MSI NX8500GT-TD256E 7.3 1600x1200 High Settings: Points Ranking Palit HD4870 X2 2GB 70 Asus EAH3870 X2 1GB TOP/G/3DHTI/1G/A 20.9 MSI R3870X2-T2D1G-OC 39.5 Asus EAH4890 HTDI/1GD5/A 44.9 Asus EAH4850 HTDI/512M 30.3 MSI R4830 T2D512-OC (Radeon 4830) 16.5 Gigabyte GV-R477D5-512HB 31.2 Asus EAH4770 HTDI/512MD5/A 31 ASUS EAH4550 512M 7 Diamond HD 3650 PE 512 5.5 Diamond Viper Radeon HD 2900XT 18.5 MSI RX2600XT Diamond 3.6 ASUS ENGTX260 MT/HTDI/896MD3-A 18.1 Gigabyte GV-N26OC896H-GA 35.2 Sparkle GTX260 Core 216 33.2 ASUS ENGTS250 DK 26.5 ASUS EN9600GT DI/512MD3/A 17.7 Gigabyte GV-N96TSL-1GI 18.9 Asus EN9600GT Top/HTDI/512M 18.2 Foxconn 9600GT-512NOC 17.8 Palit Geforce 9600GT 512 18.2 Biostar V903GT52-NV1AN 16.6 ASUS EN9400GT DI/1GLP 4.9 Asus EN8800GT TOP/G/HTDP/512M/A 17.3 Foxconn 8600GTS-256 4.2 MSI NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC 4.3 Albatron 8600GT-256 2.6 MSI NX8500GT-TD256E 1

Compared to other entry-level videocards, the ASUS EN9400GT videocard is still pretty poor. You need about 30 FPS to get at least playable smoothness in most games, and this videocard falls well short of that.