|
AthlonXP 2000+ Vs. P4
Test Environment:
It's now time to get into the details and start looking
at benchmarks! Both processors will be tested on PC2400 DDR based
systems for the best possible "apples-to-apples" comparison. As such, the P4
will be slightly handicapped as we all know it performs its' absolute best with
the i850 chipset and RDRAM. However, RDRAM is not exactly popular with
consumers, and so DDRAM is quickly gaining market supremacy. Conversely, we will
not be testing the XP200+ against a SDRAM based P4 system because that really
wouldn't be much of comparison would
it?
Processor |
Core |
General Specs |
|
|
|
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Running at 1.67GHz with 37.5 million transistors,
the XP has a 128mm square core based on the 0.18 micron process from AMD's
Fab 30 in Dresden Germany. The XP 2000+ uses 128KB L1 and 256KB L2 Cache.
The chip requires 1.75V to operate and produces upto 70W of thermal
power (it typically sits at 62.5W) which is a substantial amount of heat. Max
Icc processor current draw is 40A, and typically 35.7A, underlining
the need for a good high wattage
power supply.
Unit Retail Cost is approx.: $540
CDN |
|
|
Intel Pentium4 2.0GHz
Running at 2.0GHz, the P4 has a 217mm
square core based on the 0.18 micron process from the Costa Rica Fab. The P4 2GHz
uses 8KB L1 cache, 256KB L2 Advanced Transfer cache, a 128-Bit Floating
Point Port and SIMD 128-bit Integer. The chip produces up to 75.3W of thermal power which is a
bit more than the XP 2000+, but has a built-in
thermal monitoring and an advanced thermal throttling
system.
Unit Retail Cost is approx.: $830
CDN |
|
test system specs: |
|
computer hardware: |
intel 2.0ghz system |
athlon xp 2000+ system |
processor: |
intel pentium4 2.0ghz |
amd athlon xp 2000+ |
clock
speed: |
2000 mhz |
1670 mhz |
motherboard: |
msi 845 ultra-aru |
asus a7v266-e |
chipset: |
intel i845d |
via kt266a |
videocard: |
asus v8200t5/64mb (gf3ti500) |
network
card: |
allied telesyn at-2700tx 10/100 |
memory: |
corsair (x2) 256mb pc2400 ddr, cas2 |
hard drive: |
samsung sv6004h 5400rpm udma100 60gb |
ibm deskstar 7200rpm udma100 40gb (winxp) samsung 7200rpm 40gb udma 100 (win2k) |
cdrom: |
samsung sm-308 cdrw-dvd |
16x pioneer dvd-rom |
floppy: |
mitsumi 1.44mb |
heatsink: |
arkua 8568 |
foxconn generic |
powersupply: |
enermax 431watt |
antec 400w |
detonator driver: |
21.83 |
21.83 |
|
|
overall system
benchmarks:
SYSmark2001 uses real world applications concurrently
as an accurate way to test the system by following patterns that reflect
the way real users work. SYSmark2001's workloads accurately represent today's
updated business usage model. The benchmark runs at a realistic execution speed,
with think times between application interactions, in order to emulate a desktop
user's interaction with the operating system and applications.
Higher numbers denote better performance.
BapCo SysMark 2001 Benchmark Results |
|
Processor / Test |
Sysmarks |
Ranking |
|
Internet Content Creation |
|
|
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ |
194 |
|
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz |
210 |
|
|
Office Productivity |
|
|
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ | 190 |
|
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz |
142 |
|
The Pentium 4 chip kicks the but off the Athlon XP2000+
in the first round of benchmarks with Internet Content Creation by a lead of 16
points. The tables turn however when we look at Office productivity, where the
Athlon XP 2000+ positively kills the P4 with a lead of almost 50 points.
SuperPI
calculates the number PI to 1 Million digits in this raw number crunching
benchmark. The benchmark is fairly diverse and allows the user to change the
number of digits of PI that can be calculated from 16 Thousand to 32
Million. The benchmark, which uses 19 iterations in the test, is set 1
Million digits.
Lower numbers denote faster calculation times
(seconds), and hence, better performance.
Super PI (1 Million digits) Benchmark Results |
|
Processor |
seconds |
Ranking |
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ |
75 sec |
|
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz |
95 sec |
|
SuperPI is a new benchmark for us, and more fun than
anything else. While it takes only 95 seconds on the Pentium 4 for SuperPi to
calculate Pi to 1,000,000 digits, it takes just 75 seconds on the Athlon XP
2000+. AMD chips have always been known for their number crunching qualities,
something which has made them the darlings of gamers around the world.
Sisoft Sandra
001 |
Source: SiSoft |
|
SiSoft
Sandra has been around for
some time, and in this series of tests for CPU, Memory and Multimedia the Athlon
XP 2000+ just kills the Pentium 4. It's almost painful to watch a $800CDN chip being
out performed by one that is almost half
the price.
SiSoft Sandra 001 Benchmark Results |
|
Processor |
Score |
|
CPU Bench |
|
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ (Dhrystone) |
4635 MIPS |
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz (Dhrystone) |
3903 MIPS |
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ (Whetstone) |
2321 MFLOPS |
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz (Whetstone) |
1055/2475 MFLOPS |
|
Multimedia Bench |
|
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ (Integer) |
9101 it/s |
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz (Integer) |
7983 it/s |
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ (Floating Point) |
10673 it/s |
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz (Floating Point) |
9792 it/s |
|
Memory Bench |
|
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ (Integer) |
2014 MB/s |
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz (Integer) |
1053 MB/s |
1. |
Athlon XP2000+ (Float) |
1903 MB/s |
2. |
Pentium4 2.0GHz (Float) |
1052 MB/s |
|
|
|
|