PCMark is a new benchmark from our pals at MadOnion
which a whole system benchmark. It can be used on desktop PC's, Laptops and even
Workstations and tests everyday computing from home to office usage. PCMark
specifically stresses the CPU, memory subsystem, graphics subsystem, hard
drives, WindowsXP GUI (if WinXP is used), video performance and even laptop
batteries. This benchmark was released March 12, 2002 and can be downloaded from
Madonion if you would like to give it a test run on your computer for
comparisons sake.
PCMark2002
seems to like the Duron. While the numbers aren't the highest they are very
respectable for a budget processor!
3DMark2001 SE is the latest installment in
the 3DMark series by MadOnion. By combining DirectX8 support with completely new
graphics, it continues to provide good overall system benchmarks. 3DMark2001 SE
has been created in cooperation with the major 3D accelerator and processor
manufacturers to provide a reliable set of diagnostic tools. The suite
demonstrates 3D gaming performance by using real-world gaming technology to test
a system's true performance abilities. Tests include: DirectX8 Vertex Shaders,
Pixel Shaders and Point Sprites, DOT3 and Environment Mapped Bump Mapping,
support for Full Scene Anti-aliasing and Texture Compression and two game tests
using Ipion real-time physics. Higher 3DMark scores denote better
performance.
3DMark2001 SE Default Benchmark Results |
|
Processor |
3DMarks |
Ranking |
1. |
1 GHz Duron 10x100 MHz |
9822 |
|
2 |
1.44 GHz Duron 10x144 MHz |
10246 |
|
Almost hitting 10000 3DMarks at stock speeds is
quite a feat! One of the nice things is with a GeForce 4 Ti4600 is that
at 3DMark 2001SE's default resolution 1024x768-32 bit we're all CPU
limited! As the CPU speed goes up so do the scores, 440 MHz more CPU speed and
we get almost 600 more points!
Return to Castle Wolfenstein is a relatively new
game benchmark. However, RTCW takes up where Quake III left off and continues to
form the basis of the first person shooter system stressing that QIII has become
a hallmark for. Based upon the Quake III engine, RTCS is obviously going to be
quite taxing on even a top end system. Higher numbers denote faster frames per
second (FPS), and hence, better performance.
RTCW
(640x480 atdemo6) Benchmark Results |
|
Processor |
(FPS) |
Ranking |
1. |
1 GHz Duron 10x100 MHz |
49.3 |
|
2 |
1.44 GHz Duron 10x144 MHz |
52.7 |
|
RTCW (640x480
atdemo8) Benchmark Results |
|
Processor |
(FPS) |
Ranking |
1. |
1 GHz Duron 10x100 MHz |
136.8 |
|
2 |
1.44 GHz Duron 10x144 MHz |
146 |
|
It's well known that the atdemo6 demo is all CPU limited
and for the first time, the Duron 1 GHz seems a little weak here. It's among the
lowest scores we've ever seen. Same thing goes for the atdemo8 demo. Upping the
CPU speed helps a bit. Of course everything is relative since the game is still very playable.