PCSTATS     
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Motherboards by Brand
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

AMD AthlonXP 2500+ Barton Processor Review
AMD AthlonXP 2500+ Barton Processor Review - PCSTATS
AMD built the AthlonXP 2500+ based on the 0.13 micron process, and so the core has a total transistor count of 54.3 million.
 82% Rating:   
Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: AMD Nov 24 2003   C. Sun  
Home > Reviews > CPU / Processors > AMD AthlonXP 2500+

Benchmarks: PCMark2002, 3DMark2001

PCMark 2002 Source: FutureMark

PCMark can be used on desktop PC's, Laptops and even Workstations and tests everyday computing from home to office usage. PCMark specifically stresses the CPU, memory subsystem, graphics subsystem, hard drives, WindowsXP GUI (if WinXP is used), video performance and even laptop batteries.

PCMark2002 Benchmark Results
Processor PCMarks Ranking
1. Pentium 4 3.2C 7910
2. Athlon64 3200+ 6532
3. AthlonXP 3200+ 6864
4. AthlonXP 2500+ 5726
5. AthlonXP 2500+ @ 2.21 GHz 6794

Memory

1 Pentium 4 3.2C 9045
2. Athlon64 3200+ 8835
3. AthlonXP 3200+ 6575
4. AthlonXP 2500+ 5694
5. AthlonXP 2500+ @ 2.21 GHz 6075

PCMark has always favored Intel based systems and that's why nothing scores close to the P4.

3DMark2001 SE Source: MadOnion

By combining DirectX8 support with completely new graphics, it continues to provide good overall system benchmarks. 3DMark2001 SE has been created in cooperation with the major 3D accelerator and processor manufacturers to provide a reliable set of diagnostic tools. The suite demonstrates 3D gaming performance by using real-world gaming technology to test a system's true performance abilities. Tests include: DirectX8 Vertex Shaders, Pixel Shaders and Point Sprites, DOT3 and Environment Mapped Bump Mapping, support for Full Scene Anti-aliasing and Texture Compression and two game tests using Ipion real-time physics. Higher 3DMark scores denote better performance.

3DMark2001 SE Benchmark Results
Processor 3DMarks Ranking
1. Pentium 4 3.2C 18305
2. Athlon64 3200+ 20322
3. AthlonXP 3200+ 18057
4. AthlonXP 2500+ 15974
5. AthlonXP 2500+ @ 2.21 GHz 17399

There's nothing that can compare to the power of the Athlon64 right now in 3DMark2001 but the AthlonXP 2500+ still does pretty well for itself. The reason why the XP 2500+ when overclocked still cannot reach XP 3200+ performance is because the FSB is lower.

< Previous Page © 2023 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: AMD AthlonXP 2500+
 Pg 1.  AMD AthlonXP 2500+ Barton Processor Review
 Pg 2.  Overclockers Delight?
 Pg 3.  Benchmarks: Sysmark 2002, Winstone 2002
 Pg 4.  Benchmarks: SuperPi, POVRay
 Pg 5.  Benchmarks: ScienceMark, SiSoft Sandra
 Pg 6.  — Benchmarks: PCMark2002, 3DMark2001
 Pg 7.  Benchmarks: Quake III Arena, UT2003
 Pg 8.  Mainstream parts have never been better!

 
Hardware Sections 


 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
PCSTATS Newsletter
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
News Archives
(Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2023 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.