PCSTATS
tests DDR memory on two major CPU platforms - the AMD Athlon64 and the Intel
Pentium 4 - because RAM behaves differently with each processor architecture.
For instance, Intel users tend to run their memory at high speeds with high
latency settings, and in general that works quite well for Intel-based
computers. It would be detrimental to system performance if you were to run the
same DDR memory settings on an AMD Athlon64 system, since latency plays a much
larger role in system performance.
Because much of our audience is made up of enthusiasts,
PCSTATS also runs overclocking tests so you can get an idea on how far the
memory will go.
On both
Intel and AMD test PCs, we're only interested in seeing how high we can go with
the memory running 1:1, as running with other dividers puts the overclocking
bottleneck elsewhere, and not with the system memory. On the Pentium 4 test
system we sometimes use higher latencies in our tests, as latencies are not as
important. With the AMD Athlon64 test system, the DDR RAM latency must run at
2-2-2-5, or the memory's tightest possible timings, as quick access is more
important to the CPU design.
Overclocking for the Xpert
Though the 'auto' voltage on the pair of
Corsair XMS Xpert TWINXP1024-3200XL modules was set to 2.75V, we lowered it to a
standard 2.60V for testing to start with.
On our
AMD test rig, using 2-2-2-5 timings, we managed 215MHz before being forced to
raise the memory voltage back to 2.75V. After this we quickly hit a wall again
at 217Mhz and were forced to raise the voltage to 2.85V. The highest overclock
we could accomplish was 221MHz. This is a decent score, but far from the best
we've seen for AMD systems. The memory did maintain 2-2-2-5 timings throughout
though.
Our Intel
test system hit its first snag at 212MHz, causing us to raise the voltage to
2.75v. Just like the AMD system, we hit our second barrier at 217MHz and again
raised the voltage to 2.85V. Loosening the timings, we were able to reach a
slightly more impressive 235MHz at 2.5-3-3-6. This memory does not seem to like
any voltage increase over 2.85V.
Overall,
the XMS Xpert TWINXP1024-3200XL DIMMs were not really that overclocker friendly.
As you'll see in our benchmarks, the stock performance of this memory matches up
well to the best that other companies can offer, but these modules appear to be
built for looks, not overclocking.
Test System Specs
|
pcstats test system
specs: |
|
athlon64 test system |
pentium 4 test system |
processor: |
amd athlon64 3200+ |
intel pentium 4 2.4c |
clock
speed: |
10 x 200 mhz = 2 ghz 9 x 223 mhz = 2.01 ghz |
12 x 200 mhz = 2.4 ghz 12 x 245 mhz = 2.94 ghz |
motherboards: |
asus k8v dlx, k8t800 |
abit ic7-max3, i875p |
videocard: |
asus radeon x800xt pe |
asus radeon x800xt pe |
memory: |
2x 512mb corsair xms xpert
twinxp1024-3200xl 2x 512mb corsair
twinx3200xl pro 2x 512mb ocz pc3200 platinum
limited ed. 2x 512mb corsair
twinx1024-4400c25pt
|
hard
drive: |
40gb wd special
ed |
20gb wd
hdd |
cdrom: |
msi x48 cd-rw/dvd-rom |
nec 52x cd-rom |
powersupply: |
vantec stealth 470w |
pc power & cooling
510w |
software setup |
windowsxp build 2600 via 4in1 4.55v catalyst
4.11 |
windowsxp build 2600 intel inf 5.02.1012 catalyst 4.11 |
benchmarks |
winstone 2004 sisoft
sandra 2004 pcmark04 3dmark2001se x2: the
threat ut2003 | |