SuperPI
calculates the number PI to 1 Million digits in this raw number crunching
benchmark. The benchmark is fairly diverse and allows the user to change the
number of digits of PI that can be calculated from 16 Thousand to 32 Million.
The benchmark, which uses 19 iterations in the test, is set 1 Million digits.
Lower
numbers denote faster calculation times (seconds), and hence, better
performance.
SuperPi |
1 Million Digits: |
Seconds |
Ranking |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
39 |
|
Intel Pentium D 940 |
40 |
|
AMD Athlon64 FX-62 |
31 |
|
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ |
34 |
|
AMD Sempron 3600+ |
42 |
|
Intel Pentium M 740 |
57 |
|
Super Pi times are rather disappointing,
however bandwidth plays such a key role in Super Pi and these results are
unsurprising given that the Pentium M 740 uses a single channel memory
controller.
PCMark05
is a premium tool for measuring both normal home use and simple 3D performance
of the latest PC hardware. There are 11 system tests - each one is designed to
represent a certain type of PC usage. By running these tests, PCMark05 stresses
the components in a similar manner as they are stressed in normal home usage.
PCMark05: |
Overall |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
5732 |
|
Intel Pentium D 940 |
8276 |
|
AMD Athlon64 FX-62 |
6496 |
|
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ |
6115 |
|
AMD Sempron 3600+ |
4018 |
|
Intel Pentium M 740 |
1926 |
|
CPU |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
5309 |
|
Intel Pentium D 940 |
5313 |
|
AMD Athlon64 FX-62 |
5716 |
|
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ |
5322 |
|
AMD Sempron 3600+ |
2908 |
|
Intel Pentium M 740 |
2815 |
|
Memory |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
4201 |
|
Intel Pentium D 940 |
4121 |
|
AMD Athlon64 FX-62 |
5072 |
|
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ |
4757 |
|
AMD Sempron 3600+ |
3787 |
|
Intel Pentium M 740 |
2447 |
|
PCMark05's overall score is not particularly
good, but there are many factors that come into play. The CPU section of the
tests shows that the Pentium M 740 has almost the same CPU power as the Sempron
3600+. The memory test results also surprise as we would have expected numbers
significantly slower due to the single channel
memory controller.