3DMark05
is best suited for the latest generation of DirectX9.0 graphics cards. It is the
first benchmark to require a DirectX9.0 compliant hardware with support for
Pixel Shaders 2.0 or higher! By combining high quality 3D tests, CPU tests,
feature tests, image quality tools, and much more, 3DMark05 is a premium
benchmark for evaluating the latest generation of gaming hardware.
Futuremark 3DMark05 1.2.0 |
Overall |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus EAX1900XTX
2DHTV/512M/A |
12098 |
|
Asus
EAX1950PRO/HTDP/256M/A |
10260 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTX-T2D768E |
15251 |
|
Foxconn
FV-N88SMCD2-ONOC |
14674 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTS-T2D320E-HD-OC |
14703 |
|
GeForce 8600GTS SLI |
15207 |
|
Foxconn 8600GTS-256 |
11640 |
|
MSI
NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC |
11676 |
|
MSI
NX7950GX2-T2D1GE |
13781 |
|
MSI
NX7900GTX-T2D512E |
11071 |
|
MSI
NX7900GS-T2D512E-OC |
8630 |
|
Gigabyte
GV-NX76T256D-RH |
5711 |
|
Biostar Sigma-Gate
GeForce 7600GS |
4998 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M |
14398 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M (675/2060) |
15231 |
|
3DMark05
results are looking rather good. The Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M toes the line with
the other GeForce 8800GTS 320MB videocards tested, and it's even just slightly
slower than the GeForce 8800GTX when overclocked.
3DMark06
is the worldwide standard in advanced 3D game performance benchmarking. A
fundamental tool for every company in the PC industry as well as PC users and
gamers, 3DMark06 uses advanced real-time 3D game workloads to measure PC
performance using a suite of DirectX 9 3D graphics tests, CPU tests, and 3D
feature tests. 3DMark06 tests include all new HDR/SM3.0 graphics tests, SM2.0
graphics tests, AI and physics driven single and multiple cores or processor CPU
tests and a collection of comprehensive feature tests to reliably measure next
generation gaming performance today.
Futuremark 3DMark06 1.0.2 |
Overall: |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus EAX1900XTX
2DHTV/512M/A |
6060 |
|
Asus
EAX1950PRO/HTDP/256M/A |
4904 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTX-T2D768E |
9785 |
|
Foxconn
FV-N88SMCD2-ONOC |
8799 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTS-T2D320E-HD-OC |
8777 |
|
GeForce 8600GTS SLI |
8827 |
|
Foxconn 8600GTS-256 |
5556 |
|
MSI
NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC |
5518 |
|
MSI
NX7950GX2-T2D1GE |
8057 |
|
MSI
NX7900GTX-T2D512E |
6173 |
|
MSI
NX7900GS-T2D512E-OC |
4945 |
|
Gigabyte
GV-NX76T256D-RH |
3268 |
|
Biostar Sigma-Gate
GeForce 7600GS |
2654 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M |
8641 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M (675/2060) |
9412 |
|
SM2.0 |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus EAX1900XTX
2DHTV/512M/A |
2342 |
|
Asus
EAX1950PRO/HTDP/256M/A |
1949 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTX-T2D768E |
4551 |
|
Foxconn
FV-N88SMCD2-ONOC |
4010 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTS-T2D320E-HD-OC |
3958 |
|
GeForce 8600GTS SLI |
4157 |
|
Foxconn 8600GTS-256 |
2376 |
|
MSI
NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC |
2343 |
|
MSI
NX7950GX2-T2D1GE |
3619 |
|
MSI
NX7900GTX-T2D512E |
2579 |
|
MSI
NX7900GS-T2D512E-OC |
1974 |
|
Gigabyte
GV-NX76T256D-RH |
1286 |
|
Biostar Sigma-Gate
GeForce 7600GS |
1007 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M |
3935 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M (675/2060) |
4363 |
|
HDR/SM3.0 |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus EAX1900XTX
2DHTV/512M/A |
2614 |
|
Asus
EAX1950PRO/HTDP/256M/A |
2011 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTX-T2D768E |
4688 |
|
Foxconn
FV-N88SMCD2-ONOC |
3976 |
|
MSI
NX8800GTS-T2D320E-HD-OC |
4006 |
|
GeForce 8600GTS SLI |
3769 |
|
Foxconn 8600GTS-256 |
2083 |
|
MSI
NX8600GTS-T2D256E-OC |
2085 |
|
MSI
NX7950GX2-T2D1GE |
3466 |
|
MSI
NX7900GTX-T2D512E |
2494 |
|
MSI
NX7900GS-T2D512E-OC |
1935 |
|
Gigabyte
GV-NX76T256D-RH |
1163 |
|
Biostar Sigma-Gate
GeForce 7600GS |
1097 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M |
3770 |
|
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320M (675/2060) |
4422 |
|
Notice the difference in stock performance between the
Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/320 and the Foxconn FV-N88SMCD2-ONOC and MSI
NX8800GTS-T2D320E-HD-OC? There's no reason to be alarmed, those two other
GeForce 8800GTS 320MB cards are overclocked pretty heavily by the factory. The
Asus videocard does well in this test, and a nice performance boost is brought
about by overclocking too. Let's see what the real world games have to say
next!