SYSmark 2007 Preview 1.01 |
Overall: |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150
200/400 939 FX-60) |
112 |
|
Albatron KM51PV-AM2
(GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
100 |
|
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF
7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
106 |
|
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD
690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
100 |
|
MSI K9AGM2-FIH
(AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
101 |
|
E-Learning |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150
200/400 939 FX-60) |
100 |
|
Albatron KM51PV-AM2
(GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
95 |
|
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF
7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
96 |
|
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD
690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
96 |
|
MSI K9AGM2-FIH
(AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
94 |
|
VideoCreation |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150
200/400 939 FX-60) |
104 |
|
Albatron KM51PV-AM2
(GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
100 |
|
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF
7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
105 |
|
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD
690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
99 |
|
MSI K9AGM2-FIH
(AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
98 |
|
Productivity |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150
200/400 939 FX-60) |
122 |
|
Albatron KM51PV-AM2
(GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
115 |
|
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF
7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
117 |
|
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD
690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
118 |
|
MSI K9AGM2-FIH
(AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
120 |
|
3D |
Points |
Ranking |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150
200/400 939 FX-60) |
102 |
|
Albatron KM51PV-AM2
(GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
104 |
|
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF
7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
107 |
|
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD
690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
104 |
|
MSI K9AGM2-FIH (AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2 5000+)
|
105 |
|
This is the second time we've run SYSmark 2007 Preview
in Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate, and the results are once again at a dead
heat. The AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ processor is running at the same speed for each
AM2 platform so this is hardly a surprising result. The the MSI MSI K9AGM2-FIH
motherboard stacks up well, but neither pulls ahead nor falls behind.
SiSoft Sandra XIb |
CPU: |
Dhrystone ALU |
Whetstone SSE3 |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150 200/400 939 FX-60) |
18939 |
15928 |
Albatron KM51PV-AM2 (GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
18928 |
16019 |
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF 7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
18939 |
15998 |
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
18945 |
16002 |
MSI K9AGM2-FIH (AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
18925 |
15976 |
Multi-Media: |
Integer SSE3 |
Floating Point SSE2 |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150 200/400 939 FX-60) |
49066 |
53492 |
Albatron KM51PV-AM2 (GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
49138 |
53485 |
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF 7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
49209 |
53406 |
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
49306 |
53512 |
MSI K9AGM2-FIH (AMD 690G
200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
49195 |
53299 |
Memory |
ALU MB/s |
FPU MB/s |
Asus A8N-VM (GF 6150 200/400 939 FX-60) |
4048 |
4059 |
Albatron KM51PV-AM2 (GF 6150 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
5782 |
5715 |
Biostar TF7050-M2 (GF 7050PV 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
5929 |
5969 |
ECS AMD690GM-M2 (AMD 690G 200/800 AM2 X2
5000+) |
5412 |
5378 |
MSI K9AGM2-FIH (AMD 690G
200/800 AM2 X2 5000+) |
5543 |
5427 |
SiSoft Sandra XIb run under Microsoft Windows Vista
again illustrates that processor results are very close to one another. Both
nVIDIA and AMD chipsets achieve similar results. The AMD 690G seems to trail
slightly in the memory bandwidth portion of this test, although it's not down by
too much.