Futuremark 3DMark 11 -
DX11 (IGP vs. IGP) |
Performance: (P) |
Points |
Ranking |
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
1000 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
1024 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
1028 |
|
Extreme: (X) |
Points |
Ranking |
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
311 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
319 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
310 |
| |
Since none of the previous Intel or AMD IGPs are DX11
compatible, the Radeon HD 6550D goes alone against itself in 3DMark 11. A score
of (P)1000 in 3DMark11 is about 1/4th of what a Geforce GTX470 will yield.
Still, pretty decent for a mainstream level of playability. PCSTATS was
surprised that the Radeon HD 6550D IGP was able to achieve (X)311 in the Extreme
portion of 3DMark 11....
Next up, STALKER - let's see how the AMD Fusion
A8-3850's IGP stands up against other integrated graphics solutions in this DX11
first person shooter.
STALKER Call of Pripyat
- DX11 (IGP vs. IGP) |
Sun Shafts Test 1600x1200 |
Points |
Ranking |
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
4.9 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
5.7 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
5.1014 |
|
Sun Shafts Test 1900x1200 |
Points |
Ranking |
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
4.2 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
4.8 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
4.3494 |
| |
Since the Radeon HD 6550D is the first DirectX11
compliant IGP there's nothing for PCSTATS to compare it against. As you can see
here, the AMD A8-3850 IGP is barely able to break 5FPS.
Heaven Benchmark 2.0 -
DX11 (IGP vs. IGP) |
1280x1024 |
Points |
Ranking |
Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3-iSSD (Intel HD 3000
IGP) |
8.5 |
|
Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 (Intel HD 3000
IGP) |
8.6 |
|
Asus P8H67-M Evo (Intel HD 3000 IGP) |
7.8 |
|
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
10 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
7.8 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
7.8 |
|
1600x1200 |
Points |
Ranking |
Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3-iSSD (Intel HD 3000
IGP) |
6 |
|
Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 (Intel HD 3000
IGP) |
6.4 |
|
Asus P8H67-M Evo (Intel HD 3000 IGP) |
6.3 |
|
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
7.7 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
6.3 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
6.3 |
|
1920x1200 |
Points |
Ranking |
Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3-iSSD (Intel HD 3000
IGP) |
5.3 |
|
Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 (Intel HD 3000
IGP) |
5.5 |
|
Asus P8H67-M Evo (Intel HD 3000 IGP) |
5.4 |
|
Biostar TA75M+ (Radeon
HD 6550D IGP) |
6.7 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
5.8 |
|
Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H (Radeon HD 6550D
IGP) |
5.5 |
| |
Heaven 2.0 reacts a little differently than you might
expect as it will run in DX10 mode or DX11 depending on the IGP's capabilities.
While the Intel HD 3000 IGP and Radeon HD 6550D IGP achieve nearly identical
results (surprisingly), the image quality is in AMD's favour. Both solutions are
sloooow.