|
|
For the performance user always having a top end system is important. I've always been very proud of the parts I used and in away it's no longer just a computer, it's my creation.
82% Rating:
|
|
Home >
Reviews >
Memory >
Apacer PC-100 |
|
|
Sandra Benchmarks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c001/7c001a38cd80639ec92b6fe7b336a6edfb34e176" alt="" |
12 x 100 MHz CL3 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eab9e/eab9e4a7e6c5475eda068b8050a232aabcf29b3b" alt="" |
12 x 100 MHz CL2 |
Does CAS Latency make that much of a difference at a 100 MHz bus speed? Apparently so. The only thing I can guess is that this memory wasn't really made to run at this speed. Remember, it's got the same DRAM as the Mushkin Rev3 sticks!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cae0c/cae0c346b24ffd8a91199c0ab5df7e737528298d" alt="" |
9 x 133 MHz CL3 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5de86/5de86631484d88bb42df62dd03d18c9eeb3154c8" alt="" |
9 x 133 MHz CL2 |
No wonder the KT133A based boards are hampering the wide spread acceptance of DDR based ones. Why would the average consumer spend a few hundred dollars more to get a DDR based system if old SDR technology can do the job almost as well?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97edb/97edb752119f967310583adff6aaf3ddc703f0dd" alt="" |
8 x 150 MHz CL3 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a489a/a489ad96e3fbf953e9c46ef447fac914be0e743b" alt="" |
8 x 150 MHz CL2 |
Well as you see, at 150 MHz, I have about the same usable memory bandwidth as DDR. Of course, all these numbers have to be taken with a grain of salt. These are synthetic and may not represent real life performance. Let's go to everyone's favorite Direct3D benchmark, Madonion's 3DMark 2001.
|
|
|
|