Please note that all the DVD-ROMs performed below their 
advertised maximum " X-speed" ratings. Generally the rated maximum speeds were 
lower during the benchmark portions of the tests.
  
   | Pioneer DVD106 - DVD Tests | 
  
    |  | 
  
  
   | Samsung SD-616 - DVD Tests | 
  
    |  | 
  
 
   | Toshiba SDM1212 - DVD Tests | 
  
    |  | 
 
  
  
    | Nero DVD Speed 99 
      Benchmark | 
  
    | DVD Drive | DVD106 | SD616 | SDM1212 | 
  
    | Disk Type | DVD-Video | DVD-Video | DVD-Video | 
  
    | Avg Speed | 5.74x | 4.85x | 4.52x | 
  
    | Random Seek Time | 98ms | 81ms | 111ms | 
  
    | 1/3 Seek Time | 111ms | 88ms | 116ms | 
  
    | Full Seek Time | 187ms | 158ms | 187ms | 
  
    | CPU use: 1X | 16 | 20 | 21 | 
  
    | CPU use: MAX | 18 | 31 | 31 | 
As you can tell from the scores, the Samsung drive 
performs just slightly behind the Pioneer in the Transfer Rate tests, while 
managing to top the Toshiba unit. In the Seek Access Times test, the Samsung SD-616 had a larger edge over the Pioneer model, and commanding lead over the Toshiba drive. 
The Pioneer drive had a much lower CPU Usage score when 
compared to both the Samsung and Toshiba at maximum speeds. I noticed that the 
Samsung drive had nearly identical scores as that of the older Toshiba during 
this particular segment of testing. In general, the Toshiba drive 
is beginning to show its age in the Interface Burst Speed tests when 
compared to the Pioneer drives blistering 8MB/s speed. The Samsung unit couldn't 
even muster up enough speed to pass the 1MB/s threshold. I attempted various 
settings and performed multiple tests to see if I could solve the low burst rate of the Samsung to no avail. Even the 2+ year old Toshiba ended up faster than the Samsung. 
While testing the units during the segment for the Spinup/Spindown Time, the Pioneer unit proved to be fastest spinning up to speed, while slowest in spinning down times (compared to the Samsung and Toshiba).
 
For the testing of Disc Eject/Load/Recognition Time, the Samsung unit took more than double the time to eject a CD when compared to the other 2 drives. Samsung was able to redeem itself when it showed that it could load a CD faster than any of the other drives, in this case a full 8 seconds faster than the Toshiba.  The Pioneer drive wouldn't register its times due to the slot load feature of this particular unit.