Pioneer DVD106 - Data Tests |
|
Samsung SD-616 - Data Tests |
|
Toshiba SDM1212 - Data Tests |
|
Nero CD Speed 99 - Data Benchmarks |
DVD Drive |
DVD106 |
SD-616 |
SDM1212 |
Disk Type |
Data |
Data |
Data |
Avg Speed |
27.76x |
31.56x |
24.14x |
Random Seek Time |
94ms |
222ms |
90ms |
1/3 Seek Time |
100ms |
111ms |
103ms |
Full Seek Time |
174ms |
173ms |
149ms |
DAE Quality |
- |
- |
- |
CPU use: 1X |
1 |
0 |
0 |
CPU use: 2X |
2 |
1 |
1 |
CPU use: 4X |
6 |
2 |
3 |
CPU use: 8X |
12 |
5 |
6 |
Burst Rate |
4MB/s |
1MB/s |
2MB/s |
Disk Eject Time |
- |
1.24 |
2.25 |
Disk Load Time: |
- |
1.16 |
10.93 |
Transfer Rate testing showed that the Samsung was
blistering fast in this segment, beating out even the Pioneer unit at a
noticeable clip. Seek Access Times showed some surprising results. It proved that the oldest drive in the test, the Toshiba also was the fastest in 2 out of the 3 performed tests.
For the tests in data mode relating to CPU
Usage, the Samsung model practically owned this category when it came down to
lowest utilization. It did tie with the Toshiba in two of the tests, and beat
out the Pioneer unit in all the results in this category. In results similar to the testing during the DVD segment of the Interface Burst Rate, the Pioneer once again had the highest MB/s when compared to its second placed competitor, the Toshiba, followed behind by the disappointing burst rate of the Samsung unit.
During the Spinup/Spindown Time tests, the Toshiba
roared ahead of the pack followed by the Pioneer unit and rearing up last is the
Samsung. The Disc Eject/Load/Recognition Time had the Samsung drive proving
fastest in the ejection and loading segments, with the Pioneer owning the lowest
recognition time. (The Toshiba drive scored 0.00 seconds in the recognition time, but I chose the Pioneer unit due to its actual timed measurement since the Toshiba didn't actually register any quantitative score.