The game DroneZ was developed to leverage features
unique to the GeForce3 nfiniteFX engine and is primarily an OpenGL benchmark. In
this rolling demo 423 unique vertex shaders can be are used to create inspiring
graphics from a host of game play scenes and provide a realtime test of the
DroneZ engine and graphics. All of the test cards were run at GeForce2 normal
mode. Sure everything looked bland, but it works!
Higher numbers denote faster frames per second
(FPS), and hence, better performance.
DroneZ (1024x768) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
174.1 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
194.7 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
201.4 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
202.1 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
214.3 |
|
DroneZ is one of the newer games out there
and serves as a good indicator of things to come. The tests were run on
GeForce2 Normal mode so all cards can compete on equal terms. This
is why the frame rate is so high.
Still,
DroneZ can differentiate between the various GF2 and GF3/GF3Ti cards. There's a
nice healthy gain when overclocking the Ti500!
Return to Castle Wolfenstein is a relatively new
game benchmark. However, RTCW takes up where Quake III left off and continues to
form the basis of the first person shooter system stressing that QIII has become
a hallmark for. Based upon the Quake III engine, RTCS is obviously going to be
quite taxing on even a top end system.
Higher numbers denote
faster frames per second (FPS), and hence, better performance.
RTCW (640x480 Normal atdemo6) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
63.7 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
66.4 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
67.2 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
67.9 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
70.1 |
|
RTCW (640x480 Normal atdemo8) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
178.4 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
180.1 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
181.6 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
181.9 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
183.4 |
|
At the lower resolutions, the system is all
CPU limited. That's obvious because even the GeForce2 Pro's fps are very close
to those of cards about $200-300 more. Turning up the resolution should solve this!
This is evident in the atdemo8 benchmarks, which is more of a overall system benchmark. In atdemo6, even
with a XP running at 1.8 GHz, the test system is still all cpu limited.
RTCW (1024x768-32bit MAX atdemo6) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
57.8 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
61.3 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
64.5 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
64.1 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
67.9 |
|
RTCW (1024x768-32bit MAX atdemo8) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
141.2 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
169.1 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
172.3 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
173.2 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
177.6 |
|
Even at 1024x768 with MAX settings, the system is
barely being pushed. Only the GeForce2 Pro starts really losing ground.
All other GeForce3's do pretty well however.
RTCW (1600x1200-32bit MAX atdemo6) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
34.2 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
49.5 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
52.4 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
52.4 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
54 |
|
RTCW (1600x1200-32bit MAX atdemo8) Benchmark Results |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Asus V7700Pro |
61.4 |
|
2. |
MSI StarForce822 |
96.1 |
|
3. |
MSI G3Ti500 Pro-VTG |
105.3 |
|
4. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure |
106.4 |
|
Overclocking Benchmark Results |
5. |
Asus V8200Ti500 Pure (280/600) |
115.3 |
|
As
expected, the V7700Pro is bringing it up in
the rear. Both GeForce3 Ti500's break the 100 fps barrier at 1600x1200 in
the atdemo8 demo which is quite a feat in itself! With the atdemo6 benchmark the
test system is still CPU limited at 1600x1200
pixels.