|
The Dimension 2400 is a budget home/office system based on Intel's i845GV chipset, and houses a Celeron 2.4Ghz processor (in the model we tested) or a Pentium 4 up to 2.8 GHz.
74% Rating:
|
|
Home >
Reviews >
Computer / SFF PCs >
Dell Dimension 2400 |
|
|
Benchmarks: Sandra, PCmark 2002/4, 3DMark2001
SiSoft Sandra 2004 |
Source: Sandra |
|
Sandra is designed to test the theoretical power of
a complete system and individual components. The numbers taken though are again,
purely theoretical and may not represent real world performance.
Sisoft Sandra
2004 Benchmark Results |
|
Multimedia Benchmark |
CPU Benchmark |
Memory Benchmark |
Processors |
Integer SSE2: |
Floating-Point SSE2: |
Dhrystone SSE2: |
Whetstone SSE2: |
Integer SSE2: |
Float SSE2: |
Dell Dimension 2400 |
14779 |
17477 |
5988 |
1744 FPU / 3213 SSE2 |
1565 |
1592 |
Units: |
it/s |
it/s |
MIPS |
MFLOPS |
MB/s |
MB/s |
Again we see middle of the road
scores, except for the low memory results. The DDR memory in the Dimension 2400
is transferring data at a slow 200MHz to synch with the 400Mhz Celeron
processor, so these low scores are not surprising. This performance hitch is the
main reason that Celerons are much cheaper than full-fledged Intel Pentium
4 processors.
PCMark can be used on desktop PC's, Laptops and
even Workstations and tests everyday computing from home to office usage. PCMark
specifically stresses the CPU, memory subsystem, graphics subsystem, hard
drives, WindowsXP GUI (if WinXP is used), video performance and even laptop
batteries.
PCMark 2002 - Benchmark
Results |
Dell Dimension 2400 |
PCMarks |
Ranking |
Processor |
5199 |
|
Memory |
3295 |
|
Hard Drive |
809 |
|
Not bad scores for the CPU
here, but the memory benchmark is very low by today's standards. Not surprising,
considering the Celeron's slow 400Mhz FSB speed. Modern 800MHz bus P4 systems
can expect to see scores over 9000 in this memory test.
PCMark 2004 - Benchmark
Results |
Dell Dimension
2400 |
PCMarks |
Ranking |
Processor |
2720 |
|
Memory |
1833 |
|
Hard Drive |
3341 |
|
Graphics |
450 |
|
Overall |
2076 |
|
For comparison purposes, we
put these results next to those of a Pentium4 'C' 3Ghz setup we had recently
benchmarked, equipped with the latest 800MHz front side bus. The P4 machine
about doubled the Dimension 2400 in the CPU test, which was pretty much as
expected, but the real blow was the memory performance. The Celeron's internal
400MHz bus communicates with the memory at 200Mhz, as opposed to the 400Mhz that
newer Intel and AMD chips achieve. The P4 system achieved memory scores about 3
times as fast as those of the Celeron-powered Dimension 2400. Hard drive scores
were about the same, indicating that the performance issues we experienced were
largely attributable to the processor choice.
By combining DirectX8 support with completely new
graphics, it continues to provide good overall system benchmarks. 3DMark2001 SE
has been created in cooperation with the major 3D accelerator and processor
manufacturers to provide a reliable set of diagnostic tools. The suite
demonstrates 3D gaming performance by using real-world gaming technology to test
a system's true performance abilities. Tests include: DirectX8 Vertex Shaders,
Pixel Shaders and Point Sprites, DOT3 and Environment Mapped Bump Mapping,
support for Full Scene Anti-aliasing and Texture Compression and two game tests
using Ipion real-time physics. Higher 3DMark scores denote better performance.
The Extreme chipset does do 3D
graphics, just not particularly well. 3D games from a few years ago, such as
Counterstrike or the original Rainbow 6 should play just fine, as this 3DMark
score indicates.
|