Unreal Tournament 2003	Source: Epic

Unreal Tournament 2003 is the sequel to 1999's multiple 'Game of the Year' award winner. It uses the very latest Unreal Engine technology - where graphics, sound and game play are taken beyond the bleeding edge. Unreal Tournament 2003 employs the use of Vertex as well as Pixel Shaders and it's recommended that you use a DirectX 8 videocard to get the most out of the game.

UT2003 - Flyby:
640x480	FPS	Ranking
Pentium 4 3.0C (i875P 200/400)	240.34
Pentium 4 540 (915P 200/400)	232.98
Pentium 4 540 (925X 200/533)	235.88
AthlonXP 3200+ (NF2 Ultra 200/400)	238.66
Athlon64 3200+ (NF3-250 200/400)	296.32
Athlon64 3800+ (K8T800 Pro 200/400)	328.25
Athlon64 3800+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400)	326.5
Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.57 GHz	326.433
UT2003 - Botmatch:
640x480	FPS	Ranking
Pentium 4 3.0C (i875P 200/400)	83.67
Pentium 4 540 (915P 200/400)	80.66
Pentium 4 540 (925X 200/533)	81.2
AthlonXP 3200+ (NF2 Ultra 200/400)	78.65
Athlon64 3200+ (NF3-250 200/400)	94.49
Athlon64 3800+ (K8T800 Pro 200/400)	106.45
Athlon64 3800+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400)	105.61
Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.57 GHz	106.33

The Athlon64 has traditionally done well in UT2003 and here we see that the Athlon64 3800+ is no exception. Please remember that the with the overclocked Athlon64, we had to lower the memory divider that's why performance is about the same as stock speeds.

Athlon 64 chips have traditionally done well in UT2003, and here we see that the Athlon64 3800+ is no exception as it mostly dominates the competition.

Unreal Tournament 2004	Source: Epic

Unreal Tournament 2004 is the sequel to the highly popular UT2003 and uses the very latest Unreal Engine technology. Unreal Tournament 2004 employs the use of Vertex and Pixel Shaders and it's recommended that you use a DirectX 9 videocard to you plan to play competitively.

UT2004
dm-rankin	FPS	Ranking
Pentium 4 3.0C (i875P 200/400)	90.03
Pentium 4 540 (915P 200/400)	90.13
Pentium 4 540 (925X 200/533)	91.42
AthlonXP 3200+ (NF2 Ultra 200/400)	76.55
Athlon64 3200+ (NF3-250 200/400)	105.74
Athlon64 3800+ (K8T800 Pro 200/400)	121.47
Athlon64 3800+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400)	118.63
Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.57 GHz	125.32
as-convoy	FPS	Ranking
Pentium 4 3.0C (i875P 200/400)	61.56
Pentium 4 540 (915P 200/400)	64.81
Pentium 4 540 (925X 200/533)	66.13
AthlonXP 3200+ (NF2 Ultra 200/400)	48.38
Athlon64 3200+ (NF3-250 200/400)	70.95
Athlon64 3800+ (K8T800 Pro 200/400)	72.36
Athlon64 3800+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400)	71.32
Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.57 GHz	74.11
ctf-bridgeoffate	FPS	Ranking
Pentium 4 3.0C (i875P 200/400)	127.51
Pentium 4 540 (915P 200/400)	134.09
Pentium 4 540 (925X 200/533)	136.31
AthlonXP 3200+ (NF2 Ultra 200/400)	100.49
Athlon64 3200+ (NF3-250 200/400)	147.49
Athlon64 3800+ (K8T800 Pro 200/400)	157.3
Athlon64 3800+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400)	156.92
Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.57 GHz	159.23

The Athlon 64 3800+ and 3200+ chips run away with this benchmark. An impressive showing by the slower Athlon 64 chip, but the 3800+ remains on top.