|
Overclocking Results: |
|
Patriot
Memory has done an excellent job with its PDC1G5600ELK, in fact after testing we
found that this memory offers the best of both worlds! We'll get into the
overclocking adventure in a second, but first the CPU multiplier was lowered to
6x. This way the processor will not hold back the memory in an attempt to reach
the skies.
We
decided to first try and see how high the PDC1G5600ELK memory would keep tight
2-3-2-5 (it just would not run TRCD with 2 timings) memory timings. Starting at
200 MHz, I slowly increased the motherboard clock speed in about 5 MHz
intervals. At around 218 MHz, the system seemed to give us memory related
errors, such as benchmarks dropping back to desktop. Increasing the memory
voltage to 2.8V fixed that one. Continuing on with the overclocking experiment
we hit another snag at 235 MHz. Anything higher and the memory would cause BSODs
while loading Windows, and voltage was the key yet again. Raising it to 3.1V
fixed the problems nicely. That level of power is high, but keep in mind that
this memory is built to be run with the DFI LANParty NF4-series of motherboards.
;-)
In the end with
3.2V applied we were able to get the PDC1G5600ELK memory running at 247 MHz with
2-3-2-5 memory timings. We did try higher voltages. but it seemed to be
detrimental to the overclocking experiment and in fact lowered the maximum speed
the memory was capable of. Active cooling was also applied to the memory during
these tests. At high speeds with high voltages, sufficient cooling is a
must.
It was
great to see the Patriot Memory PDC1G5600ELK memory
run so nicely with tight timings, but to be fair it is intended to be high speed
memory with lax timings - so let's test it like that. Lowering the timings to
3-5-5-9, we also changed the Command Rate to 2T, lowered the voltage to 2.9V,
and I started the overclocking tests once more from 247 MHz...
At 265
MHz the system started to become unstable, but it was not the memory's fault.
The HyperTransport speed of the motherboard was too high and so it had to be
lowered to 4x. Continuing upwards the Patriot Memory PDC1G5600ELK memory was an
absolute pleasure to overclock with and was able to reach 337 MHz before we ran
into the wall with our test system. Unfortunately the memory would not go
higher, and I am not entirely sure what was holding us back. Previously, the DFI
LanParty NF4-SLI DR motherboard had been tested up to 431 MHz, so there should
have been enough headroom.
|
pcstats test system
specs: |
processor: |
amd athlon64 4000+ |
clock
speed: |
12 x 200 mhz = 2.4 ghz 7 x 337 mhz = 2.36 ghz |
motherboards: |
dfi lanparty nf4 sli-dr (nf4-sli) |
videocard: |
msi rx800xt-vtd256e |
memory: |
2x 512mb ocz pc3500 gold dc gx 2x 512mb corsair twinx1024-3200xl pro 2x 512mb centon gemini pc3200 2x 512mb patriot pdc1g5600elk |
hard
drive: |
74gb western
digital raptor |
cdrom: |
gigabyte go-w0808a dvd
burner |
powersupply: |
pc power & cooling
turbocool 510 sli |
heatsink: |
athlon64 4000+ reference
heatsink |
software setup |
windowsxp forceware
nf4 6.53 catalyst 5.4 |
benchmarks |
business winstone 2004 sisoft sandra 2005 pcmark04 pcmark05 3dmark2001se 3dmark05 ut2003 ut2004 doom
3 | |
pcstats memory test methodology
pcstats
tests ddr memory on amd athlon64 systems only because intel has effectively made
the transition to ddr2. enthusiasts usually keep to the bleeding edge, so fast
ddr memory is useless for the intel overclocker looking for more
juice.
on amd
test systems we're only interested in seeing how high we can go with the memory
running 1:1, as running with other dividers puts the overclocking bottleneck
elsewhere, not with the system memory. We usually run DDR RAM latency at
2-2-2-5, or the memory's tightest possible timings, as quick access is important
to the CPU design. However in cases where memory is built to run at high speeds
with lax memory timings, we will run the benchmark tests at the manufacturer
specified timings. Not doing so would put high speed DIMMs at a disadvantage
since the memory may not be designed to run at tighter memory timings.
As we
move into the benchmarks a quick explanation is in order as to why the results
will show minor performance gains due to the faster memory speeds we're testing.
With previous platforms, increasing memory speed often meant also increasing the
bus speed between the processor and memory. Since the memory controller is
integrated into the Athlon64 processor, overclocking memory does not increase
the speed of data moving to and from the processor any further, since there is
no bus. To really get the most from your memory overclocking, you must also
increase the CPU speed so it can handle the increased memory bandwidth. The
reason why we do not do this during testing is because CPU speed will affect the
benchmarks and that would not allow the results to be directly comparable to
previous tests. By keeping the processor at approximately the same speed for all
tests, we are seeing the real world benefit from the increased memory frequency
alone.
Overclocking Athlon64s is a bit different since there is
no more bus between the memory and CPU. On your system, make sure you increase
the speed of your processor so you can get the most out of both the memory and
CPUs!
With that out of the way, let's get started with the benchmarks!