Winstone
2004 |
Source: Zdnet |
|
Business Winstone 2004 runs real applications
through a series of scripted activities and uses the time a PC takes to complete
these activities to produce its performance scores.
Content Creation Winstone 2004 is a
system-level, application-based benchmark that measures a PC's overall
performance when running top, Windows-based, 32-bit, content creation
applications in Windows XP.
Winstone
2004 |
Business Winstone 2004: |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
25.3 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33839/33839f1ba420027bd88915eedce71c53e14303d4" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a962/7a9626f6c557897b10059afbd7193e8997b3085c" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf378/bf3780f3de02a3d564fd1ceaa423dd639b3cb14a" alt="" |
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ |
31.8 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0b5f/f0b5f2e401a169f42381dc18237ff7ec4f77fd32" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5f2f/d5f2f974984a60f393cdf967b6c4dc7688473991" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/529ef/529ef93d5fcf03b24a7e35e3321161ce32daf654" alt="" |
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 |
33.3 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/befa8/befa8059cb43b618879d0b7ea735d6862a125089" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2305/c2305e51465dfedb8f173ea1c1555ee3f905f049" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885bc/885bc8f0c3b775f0a26b846b3b5a44e06c37c403" alt="" |
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 @ 2.88 GHz |
35.2 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/befa8/befa8059cb43b618879d0b7ea735d6862a125089" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2305/c2305e51465dfedb8f173ea1c1555ee3f905f049" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885bc/885bc8f0c3b775f0a26b846b3b5a44e06c37c403" alt="" |
Content Creation 2004: |
Points |
Ranking |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
33.7 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33839/33839f1ba420027bd88915eedce71c53e14303d4" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a962/7a9626f6c557897b10059afbd7193e8997b3085c" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf378/bf3780f3de02a3d564fd1ceaa423dd639b3cb14a" alt="" |
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ |
41.4 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0b5f/f0b5f2e401a169f42381dc18237ff7ec4f77fd32" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5f2f/d5f2f974984a60f393cdf967b6c4dc7688473991" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/529ef/529ef93d5fcf03b24a7e35e3321161ce32daf654" alt="" |
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 |
43.6 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/befa8/befa8059cb43b618879d0b7ea735d6862a125089" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2305/c2305e51465dfedb8f173ea1c1555ee3f905f049" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885bc/885bc8f0c3b775f0a26b846b3b5a44e06c37c403" alt="" |
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 @ 2.88 GHz |
45.8 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/befa8/befa8059cb43b618879d0b7ea735d6862a125089" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2305/c2305e51465dfedb8f173ea1c1555ee3f905f049" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885bc/885bc8f0c3b775f0a26b846b3b5a44e06c37c403" alt="" |
In the Winstone 2004 tests both AMD chips
hold a healthy lead over Intel's dual core Pentium D 840. The AMD Athlon64 X2
4800+ and FX-60 perform quite closely, although the FX-60 obviously comes out
with the better scores. When overclocked, the Athlon64 FX-60 scores about 30%
higher than the Intel Pentium D 840 at stock! The Athlon64 certainly holds a lot
of promise for office computer systems, now only if Dell would get the
message...
SiSoft Sandra
2005 |
Source: Sandra |
|
Sandra is
designed to test the theoretical power of a complete system and individual
components. The numbers taken though are again, purely theoretical and may not
represent real world performance.
Sisoft Sandra 2005 Benchmark
Results |
|
Multimedia Benchmark |
CPU Benchmark |
Memory Benchmark |
Processors |
Integer SSE2: |
Floating-Point
SSE2: |
Dhrystone SSE2: |
Whetstone SSE2: |
Integer SSE2: |
Float SSE2: |
Intel Pentium D 840 |
35981 |
42592 |
17318 |
4586 FPU / 7891 SSE2 |
5076 |
5071 |
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ |
45781 |
49521 |
20272 |
7608 FPU / 9852 SSE2 |
5828 |
5777 |
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 |
49259 |
53793 |
22016 |
8257 FPU / 10704 SSE2 |
5888 |
5949 |
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 @ 2.88 GHz |
54263 |
59238 |
24389 |
9028 FPU / 11786 SSE2 |
6058 |
6109 |
Units: |
it/s |
it/s |
MIPS |
MFLOPS |
MB/s |
MB/s |
SiSoft Sandra 2005 is good at determining a processor's
theoretical power. From the results here, it's clear that the AMD Athlon64 FX-60
is the most powerful desktop processor on the market that PCSTATS has yet
tested. At stock speeds, its memory bandwidth seems a bit on the low side, but
it's worth recalling that the memory controller is not sharing bandwidth between
the two physical cores.