3DMark05
is best suited for the latest generation of DirectX9.0 graphics cards. It is the
first benchmark to require a DirectX9.0 compliant hardware with support for
Pixel Shaders 2.0 or higher! By combining high quality 3D tests, CPU tests,
feature tests, image quality tools, and much more, 3DMark05 is a premium
benchmark for evaluating the latest generation of gaming hardware.
3DMark05 |
Overall |
Points |
Ranking |
MSI RX1800XT-VT2D512E |
9117 |
|
Gigabyte GV-RX18L256V-B |
7390 |
|
ATi Radeon X850 XT PE |
6568 |
|
MSI RX800XT-VTD256E |
5921 |
|
ATi Radeon X800 XL |
5301 |
|
PowerColor X700 Pro |
3286 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D512E |
9147 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (Single) |
7696 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (SLI Mode) |
11571 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (Single) |
6883 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (SLI Mode) |
11161 |
|
MSI NX6800GT-T2D256E |
5288 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (Single) |
3287 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (SLI Mode) |
6425 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A |
10905 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A (682/1.6 GHz) |
11024 |
|
The Asus
EAX1900XTX 2DHTV/512M/A is a powerhouse in 3DMark05. It scores almost as high
as two 7800GT/GTXs in SLI! At stock speeds, this Asus videocard breaks 10,905 points. Overclocking
pushes it past the 11k mark which is very impressive.
3DMark06 is the worldwide standard in advanced 3D game
performance benchmarking. A fundamental tool for every company in the PC
industry as well as PC users and gamers, 3DMark06 uses advanced real-time 3D
game workloads to measure PC performance using a suite of DirectX 9 3D graphics
tests, CPU tests, and 3D feature tests. 3DMark06 tests include all new HDR/SM3.0
graphics tests, SM2.0 graphics tests, AI and physics driven single and multiple
cores or processor CPU tests and a collection of comprehensive feature tests to
reliably measure next generation gaming performance today.
3DMark06 |
Overall: |
Points |
Ranking |
MSI RX1800XT-VT2D512E |
3976 |
|
Gigabyte GV-RX18L256V-B |
3315 |
|
ATi Radeon X850 XT PE |
2220 |
|
MSI RX800XT-VTD256E |
2012 |
|
ATi Radeon X800 XL |
1779 |
|
PowerColor X700 Pro |
776 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D512E |
4314 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (Single) |
3826 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (SLI Mode) |
5707 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (Single) |
3406 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (SLI Mode) |
5262 |
|
MSI NX6800GT-T2D256E |
2349 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (Single) |
1461 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (SLI Mode) |
2310 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A |
4903 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A (682/1.6 GHz) |
5023 |
|
SM2.0 |
Points |
Ranking |
MSI RX1800XT-VT2D512E |
1810 |
|
Gigabyte GV-RX18L256V-B |
1429 |
|
ATi Radeon X850 XT PE |
1172 |
|
MSI RX800XT-VTD256E |
1046 |
|
ATi Radeon X800 XL |
909 |
|
PowerColor X700 Pro |
370 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D512E |
1953 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (Single) |
1726 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (SLI Mode) |
3121 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (Single) |
1484 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (SLI Mode) |
2764 |
|
MSI NX6800GT-T2D256E |
978 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (Single) |
567 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (SLI Mode) |
919 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A |
2290 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A (682/1.6 GHz) |
2379 |
|
HDR/SM3.0 |
Points |
Ranking |
MSI RX1800XT-VT2D512E |
1808 |
|
Gigabyte GV-RX18L256V-B |
1427 |
|
ATi Radeon X850 XT PE |
0 |
|
MSI RX800XT-VTD256E |
0 |
|
ATi Radeon X800 XL |
0 |
|
PowerColor X700 Pro |
0 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D512E |
2214 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (Single) |
1709 |
|
MSI NX7800GTX-VT2D256E (SLI Mode) |
2960 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (Single) |
1471 |
|
Asus EN7800GT 2DHTV/256M/OSP/A (SLI Mode) |
2609 |
|
MSI NX6800GT-T2D256E |
899 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (Single) |
529 |
|
MSI NX6600GT-TD128E (SLI Mode) |
924 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A |
2552 |
|
Asus EAX1900XTX/2DHTV/512M/A (682/1.6 GHz) |
2650 |
|
3DMark06
results put the Asus EAX1900XTX 2DHTV/512M/A in a good light. The Radeon
X1900XTX performs very well compared to Geforce 7800 series videocards in SLI.
The reason why previous generation ATi videocards did not post results in
portions of this test is because the do not support SM3.0.