The
Comanche 4 benchmark demo is a unique test as it represents a real-world gaming
experience. It contains the single player "Eagle's Talon" mission from the game
as well as a detailed cinematic. This DirectX 8.1 benchmark demo will measure
your system's performance in the standard frames per second format. The
benchmark was run with audio disabled.
Comanche 4 -
640x480 |
Motherboards |
FPS |
Ranking |
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 PRO 200/400) |
79.6 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
78.96 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
79.51 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
80.54 |
|
Comanche
4 is a good full system benchmark, and it comes as no surprise that the results
are virtually identical across all test systems.
A
completely rewritten 3D engine based on DirectX8 encompasses many visual effects
such as volumetric Nebulae (gas clouds) that have a real impact in the game (you
can hide in them) and many new engine, shield, weapon and explosion effects.
Objects cast real dynamic 3D shadows! Dynamic DP3 bump mapping allows a
previously unseen level of detail.
X2 The Threat -
640x480 |
Motherboards |
FPS |
Ranking |
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 PRO 200/400) |
192.69 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
203.556 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
198.56 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
197.482 |
|
The
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 comes in just behind the NF3-based Epox 9NDA3+ and MSI K8N
Neo2 boards in X2: The Threat. The difference is very slight, but probably due
to the slightly slower videocard it was using.
Unreal Tournament
2003 |
Source:
Epic |
|
Unreal
Tournament 2003 is the sequel to 1999's multiple 'Game of the Year' award
winner. It uses the very latest Unreal Engine technology - where graphics, sound
and game play are taken beyond the bleeding edge. Unreal Tournament 2003 employs
the use of Vertex as well as Pixel Shaders and it's recommended that you use a
DirectX 8 videocard to get the most out of the game.
UT2003 -
640x480 |
Flyby: |
FPS |
Ranking |
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 PRO 200/400) |
352.42 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
343.52 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
346.19 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
357.077 |
|
Botmatch: |
FPS |
Ranking |
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 PRO 200/400) |
111.71 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
108.12 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
109.58 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
112.15 |
|
We can
see the raw power of the Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 here as it blasts through the
UT2003 benchmarks just ahead of the K8T800 pro based MSI K8T Neo2-FIR
motherboard.