AquaMark is another DirectX 8 benchmark. Using
vertex shaders, any card that is DirectX8 compatible will not just have a huge
speed boost, the image will also look better. Default test has 24 MB worth of
textures.
AquaMark 1024x768 |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Albatron GeForce4
MX440 |
24.8 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df687/df6874d1bd7826579527e3cdaf4f2fc39c270fb1" alt="" |
2. |
Albatron GeForce4
Ti4600 |
67.2 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/111cd/111cd7a019b60be37a719bf8e6e5504118b97a90" alt="" |
3. |
ECS AG400 |
28.6 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db955/db9552fe98110064d3c8c3dd4b24a8f2cdbb67ce" alt="" |
While
everything lags behind the GeForce4 Ti4600, the ECS
AG400 is still able to edge out the GeForce4 MX440 by a
nice margin.
AquaMark 1280x1024 |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Albatron GeForce4
MX440 |
17 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df687/df6874d1bd7826579527e3cdaf4f2fc39c270fb1" alt="" |
2. |
Albatron GeForce4
Ti4600 |
45.4 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/111cd/111cd7a019b60be37a719bf8e6e5504118b97a90" alt="" |
3. |
ECS AG400 |
20 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db955/db9552fe98110064d3c8c3dd4b24a8f2cdbb67ce" alt="" |
AquaMark 1600x1200 |
|
Video Card |
FPS |
Ranking |
1. |
Albatron GeForce4
MX440 |
12.4 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df687/df6874d1bd7826579527e3cdaf4f2fc39c270fb1" alt="" |
2. |
Albatron GeForce4
Ti4600 |
33.1 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/111cd/111cd7a019b60be37a719bf8e6e5504118b97a90" alt="" |
3. |
ECS AG400 |
14.5 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db955/db9552fe98110064d3c8c3dd4b24a8f2cdbb67ce" alt="" |
With the
resolution turned up, we see that the ECS AG400 still bests the GeForce4
MX440.