HD Tach is
a physical performance hard drive test for Windows 95/98/ME and Windows NT/2000. In Windows 9X/ME it
uses a special kernel mode VXD to get maximum accuracy by bypassing the file system.
A similar mechanism is used in Windows NT/2000/XP. HD Tach reads from areas
all over the hard drive and reports an average speed.
It also logs the read speeds to a text file that you can load into a
spreadsheet and graph to visually read the results of the test.
Hard Drive Tach
2.70 - Benchmark Results |
|
Physical
Drive
Size |
Access
Time |
Read
Bust
Speed |
Read
Speed
Max |
Read
Speed
Min |
Read
Spin
Avg |
CPU
Ultilization |
No RAID, Single HDD |
120GB |
13.8ms |
83.0 |
45.6 |
22.7 |
37.6 |
26.8% |
Hardware RAID 0 |
240GB |
13.5ms |
83.1 |
71.4 |
24.9 |
40.4 |
23.6% |
(Software RAID 0)* |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Hardware RAID 1 |
120GB |
13.8ms |
82.9 |
32.5 |
13.2 |
20.4 |
19.7% |
Units: |
|
|
MB/s |
MB/s |
MB/s |
MB/s |
|
*Unfortunately, as
it can only 'see' hardware RAID arrays and not Windows created software RAID
arrays, we were unable to use HD Tach to benchmark our software stripe. The
traditional drive speed-testing benchmark show us that Hardware RAID 0 offers
the fastest data read times, while Hardware RAID 1 offers the best CPU
utilization.
Timed Data
Transfers |
Source: n/a |
|
While not the most scientific
of methods, this certainly illustrates real world file copying performance. We
hauled the 'I386' directory from a Windows Server CD onto our system drive, then
proceeded to copy this 488 MB chunk of many, many files to and from each of our
drive configurations several times, averaging the scores. Timing the transfers
revealed some interesting things.
Time Data Transfers |
|
Physical
Drive
Size |
Upstream
Transfer |
Downstream
Transfer |
No RAID, Single HDD |
120GB |
43s |
39s |
Hardware RAID 0 |
240GB |
33s |
34s |
Software RAID 0 |
240GB |
33s |
35s |
Hardware RAID 1 |
120GB |
49s |
51s |
Units: |
|
seconds |
seconds |
Again the performance
advantage RAID 0 gives us is clear.
RAID Test conclusions:
Both hardware and software
RAID 0 should offer a significant increase in overall hard disk performance to
any system. The tradeoff between the two is in expense (if your system does not
have a hardware RAID controller built in) vs. the slightly increased load on the
CPU that software RAID imposes.
We took screen shots of the
task manager CPU usage graph while we were running our file copying tests on
both RAID 0 configurations:
Hardware stripe: |
Software stripe: |
|
|
Not a huge difference, but
it's there. Overall though, either implementation will serve you well.
If you have any comments or questions, please post them in the PCSTATS Forums. Find out about this
and many other reviews by joining the Weekly PCstats.com Newsletter today!
Catch all of PCSTATS latest hardware reviews right here.