|
Overclocking Results: |
|
The Intel Pentium D 840 is comprised of two 90nm Prescott cores bumped
together, which is logical enough in terms of basic function, but has some
interesting ramifications for overclocking. Since both cores share the same die,
FSB and heatsink, will they end up stepping on each other's toes during
overclocking and reduce overall headroom compared to a single core processor?
With an eye to finding out, we used a Gigabyte GA-81955X Royal
test
platform to overclock the processor as high as it would go on air cooling...
Starting with the memory running at 533MHz, we began
increasing the FSB in 5-10MHz increments. We ran into trouble immediately, with
the system refusing to boot at 210MHz. Increasing chipset voltage by 0.1V and
memory voltage by 0.2V fixed this. The next snag hit at 230MHz FSB. The only way we could get
the motherboard to boot was by reducing its internal memory speed to 400MHz and
increasing chipset voltage by 0.3V. The processor also needed some more voltage,
to the tune of 1.35V.
Moving up through 235MHz, 240MHz and 245MHz, we increased
chipset voltage to the +0.35V maximum, and ended up running the CPU at a toasty
1.45V.
Our final destination turned out to be 251MHz;
anything beyond this would result in failed benchmarks and random
crashing. CPU temperatures peaked at about 56C, warm but not critically
so.
251MHz FSB translates to an overall speed of 4.02GHz for the Pentium D 840 test processor. This
is a fairly hefty 820MHz overclock and we were well satisfied, especially
considering the 955X Express chipset we used is brand new
and untried. It seems like doubling the cores is not going to hold
back the overclocking performance of the Pentium D to any great extent. Up
next, the benchmarks you've been looking forward to!
Test System Specs
We decided to test the Intel Pentium D 840 against its closest obvious
competitor, AMD's dual-core Athlon64 X2 4800+, as well as a selection of
the most recent single-core processors from both Intel and AMD. This
should give us a good idea of where the new dual-core chips stand in terms of
performance.
We also loaded WindowsXP x64 Edition onto the
two dual-core processors and ran a second suite of benchmarks to compare performance
on the 64-bit operating system(s) of the future.
|
PCStats Test System Specs: |
|
system 1 |
system 2 |
processor: |
intel pentium 4 540 intel pentium d
840 |
athlon64 4000+ athlon64 x2 4800+ |
clock
speed: |
16 x 200 MHz = 3.2
GHz 16 x 251 MHz = 4.02GHz |
12 x 200 MHz = 2.4 GHz
|
Motherboards: |
Gigabyte GA-8ANXP-D, i925X Gigabyte GA-81955X Royal,
i955X |
DFI LANParty NF4 SLI-DR |
Videocard: |
MSI RX800XT-VTD |
MSI RX800XT-VTD |
Memory: |
2x 512MB Crucial Ballistix PC2-5300 |
2x 512MB Corsair TwinX3200XL PRO |
Hard Drive:
|
74GB Western Digital Raptor |
74GB Western Digital Raptor |
CDROM: |
MSI X48 CD-RW/DVD-ROM |
NEC 52x CD-ROM |
PowerSupply: |
Vantec Stealth 470W |
Vantec Stealth 470W |
Heatsink: |
Thermaltake Jungle 512 |
Prometeia Mach II GT (review) |
Software
Setup |
WindowsXP Professional WindowsXP x64 Edition Intel
INF 7.2.1.1003 Catalyst 5.6 |
WindowsXP Professional WindowsXP x64 Edition nVIDIA
nForce4 6.53 Catalyst 5.6 |
Benchmarks
|
SYSmark 2004 Business
Winstone 2004 Content Creation 2004 SiSoft Sandra
2005 Cinebench 2003 (32/64 Bit) Maya Render
Test ScienceMark 2.0 (32/64 Bit) Super Pi 1.1 Hexus piFast
4.1 POVray
3.1g PCMark04 PCMark05 3DMark2001 3DMark05 Comanche
4 UT2003 UT2004 Doom 3
| |